CISC849 S2018 HW2
Due Friday, March 23, midnight
NOTE: YOU MAY WORK ALONE OR IN TEAMS OF TWO
Images are generally small -- in the range of ~50 x 50 to ~100 x 100.
There are 51 object categories with 300 total instances (e.g., 5 examples of apple, 6 examples of pliers, and so on). A hierarchy of object types, shown below, indicates that there are 4 main groups or subtrees: fruits, vegetables, devices, and containers.
Each object instance was photographed on a turntable with an RGB-D camera; hence there are multiple views of each instance both as color and depth images. The naming scheme for the files generated is given here, but you will focus on the color and/or depth images. For example, toothpaste_2_1_190_crop.png is the 190th RGB frame of the 1st video sequence of the 2nd instance of a toothpaste object, and toothpaste_2_1_190_depthcrop.png is the corresponding depth image of the same toothpaste instance from the same angle.
Your challenge will be to train a convolutional neural network in TensorFlow to categorize a given RGB and/or depth image into 1 of the 4 subtrees above -- NOT one of the 51 categories. You may use any TensorFlow-based convnet classification architecture that you wish, starting from random or pre-trained weights -- your choice. There are several places to possibly start from (you don't have to use any of them):
- First work through this CIFAR-10 training tutorial and then try to format the RGB-D images into a similar format and train on them
- Format the RGB-D images into four subtree directories such that you can fine-tune an existing Inception network on them as described here
There are two main guidelines:
- Instance 1 of every object category (e.g., toothpaste_1, apple_1, etc.) may NOT be used for training (weight learning) or validation (hyperparameter tuning). Rather, it must be used only for testing (aka evaluation) of your final classifier(s)
- If you have limited time, learn how to classify the RGB images (color). But if you have the time, try to learn how to classify the depth images (pure shape) alone and present a comparison of how the two approaches worked.
Please submit a 2-page WRITE-UP of your approach and results. What network did you use (citation + link to GitHub or tutorial page you took code from), what modifications (if any) did you make to it, how did you conduct training, how did you augment or alter the training dataset, and what accuracies were you able to get for classification tasks. Add notes about any issues you encountered or interesting observations you made.