Difference between revisions of "CISC181 S2015 LabGrading"
From class_wiki
(Created page with "0.5% of each lab’s 3% is attendance We use a “bucket” grading scale for the rest of the lab: * 2.5: ''Outstanding'': All requirements met, plus '''additional''' featur...") |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 10:12, 18 January 2017
0.5% of each lab’s 3% is attendance
We use a “bucket” grading scale for the rest of the lab:
- 2.5: Outstanding: All requirements met, plus additional features or especially elegant approach.
- If you believe you have added features worthy of extra credit, please let the TA know in your submission (there's a text box on the Sakai page you can use)
- If you have questions about whether something you're considering might qualify, don't hesitate to ask!
- 2.0: Very good: All requirements satisfied without issues
- 1.5: Satisfactory: Nearly all requirements met; some small problems
- 1.0: Fair: Some requirements not met; non-trivial problems
- 0.5: Poor: Extremely serious problems, but some effort/understanding displayed. This is your highest grade possible if your submission does not compile, so MAKE SURE IT DOES!
- 0.0: No credit: No submission or unmodified/minimally modified template code submitted
